Who executed a 19yr old for demonstrating?

They killed some cops I think, but I agree that it's wrong

Be careful that we are not being fooled

how do we know he wasn’t an agent of the Zionist faction of Israel

.................

But the USA can kill two Americans in their own country for protesting against ICE.

“This site allows posters who are vacuous.”

@sgtdjones

Do you realize how extremely foolish your conflation is? Especially so when over and over those Minnesota executions were condemned here. Seeking relevance?

@Brerzerk

You are quick to condemn Iran for executing a 19-year-old protester, yet you have comparable violence at home, where authorities have killed demonstrators. The contrast is hard to ignore, just not, apparently, for you.

Did you even register the contradiction in your own post, or did it slip by unnoticed? It’s a strange kind of moral clarity that only works at a distance. Criticizing another country for actions applicable and present in your own country isn’t principled; it’s convenient.

You might want to look up the word “vacuous.” You may find it more relevant than you think. As for "foolish", I leave it to you, as you seem to be an expert at such.

And as for your sudden pivot to “relevance,” that’s a neat deflection, but it doesn’t make your argument any less hollow.

@sgtdfoolishjones

You're indeed correct that I know how to spot foolishness from stupid ppl inserting themselves in want of relevance. Your cheap unsolicited compliment is however neither welcomed nor appreciated.

@Brerzerk

When one cannot rebut facts, they resort to...

Here’s a short summary of what’s wrong with the sentence you posted above:

Redundant phrasing: “You’re indeed correct” is repetitive.

Informal shorthand: “ppl” should be “people.”

Awkward/archaic wording: “in want of relevance” is not natural modern English.

Poor preposition/phrase use: “spot foolishness from X” is awkward; use “spot foolishness in X” or “spot X.”

Wordiness: “that I know how to spot” could be simpler (“I can spot”).

Tone issues: using both “foolishness” and “stupid” is repetitive.

If you were intelligent, you would not have posted the above, so you didn't finish high school?

You're indeed correct that I know how to spot foolishness from stupid ppl inserting themselves in want of relevance.

A simple explanation of the above: "It takes one to know one"... You just called yourself a fool, so you do show relevance.

🤔

@Brerzerk

Since you are so concerned about the death of a young one in Iran....

Dem find out who going to jail for bombing the school that kill 170 school girls yet?

Here on this side of the planet, two wrongs don't make a right. Iran is dead wrong, and no, the United States is not excused from wanton killings.

@XDFIX

Correct

Trying to find the hero between two devils fighting is madness

@sgtdjones

Ignorance is bliss. Only reason could a fool's summary of a sentence be thrice as long as the sentence. Unsolicited means unwelcomed so no further engagement, you've embarrassed yourself enough.

Trexie, ah dpan know but if yuh start a thread on the school bombing I'll share my thoughts

@Brerzerk

What did I miss? I thought pretty much everyone here was in agreement that the ICE executions are an indictment on the USA.

Jonesy jonesing or wah?

@Trex

Is it possible to walk and chew gum at the same time? It's not a lost art, is it?

@Brerzerk

Be kind to the low-value imbecile please😢